Funka next week Andrew Kirkpatrick (Friday, 31 March)
Focus for the week Andrew Kirkpatrick (Friday, 31 March)
Comments will be late Gregg C Vanderheiden (Wednesday, 29 March)
Scribes for April Andrew Kirkpatrick (Tuesday, 28 March)
- RE: AGWG meeting March 28th, 2017 EA Draffan (Saturday, 25 March)
- RE: AGWG meeting March 28th, 2017 Smith, Jim (Monday, 27 March)
- RE: AGWG meeting March 28th, 2017 Bailey, Bruce (Monday, 27 March)
- RE: AGWG meeting March 28th, 2017 Michael Pluke (Tuesday, 28 March)
- Re: AGWG meeting March 28th, 2017 Hakkinen, Mark T (Tuesday, 28 March)
- Re: AGWG meeting March 28th, 2017 Shawn Lauriat (Tuesday, 28 March)
- Re: AGWG meeting March 28th, 2017 Alastair Campbell (Tuesday, 28 March)
WCAG Thursday call Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 22 March)
Updating the Issues Andrew Kirkpatrick (Tuesday, 21 March)
March 21 Minutes Andrew Kirkpatrick (Tuesday, 21 March)
- RE: AGWG meeting March 21, 2017 EA Draffan (Friday, 17 March)
- Re: AGWG meeting March 21, 2017 Mike Elledge (Monday, 20 March)
- Re: AGWG meeting March 21, 2017 Hakkinen, Mark T (Tuesday, 21 March)
- RE: AGWG meeting March 21, 2017 Smith, Jim (Tuesday, 21 March)
Overlaps in SC lisa.seeman (Thursday, 16 March)
Apollogy Wayne Dick (Wednesday, 15 March)
Task for SC managers Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 15 March)
- RE: AGWG meeting March 7, 2017 Chakravarthula, Srinivasu (Monday, 6 March)
- Re: AGWG meeting March 7, 2017 Alastair Campbell (Monday, 6 March)
- Re: AGWG meeting March 7, 2017 Wayne Dick (Monday, 6 March)
- Re: AGWG meeting March 7, 2017 Mike Elledge (Tuesday, 7 March)
- RE: AGWG meeting March 7, 2017 Michael Pluke (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: AGWG meeting March 7, 2017 John Foliot (Tuesday, 7 March)
- RE: AGWG meeting March 7, 2017 Bailey, Bruce (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Re: AGWG meeting March 7, 2017 Jeanne Spellman (Tuesday, 7 March)
- Minutes AGWG meeting March 7, 2017 Michael Cooper (Tuesday, 7 March)
No meeting next week Andrew Kirkpatrick (Friday, 24 February)
Re: FPWD 1.4.11 Michael Cooper (Wednesday, 22 February)
RE: Publish WCAG 2.1 FPWD kimberlee.dirks@thomsonreuters.com (Tuesday, 21 February)
Re: CFC: Publish WCAG 2.1 FPWD David MacDonald (Tuesday, 21 February)
Re: CFC: Publish WCAG 2.1 FPWD Laura Carlson (Tuesday, 21 February)
Re: CFC: Publish WCAG 2.1 FPWD Marc Johlic (Tuesday, 21 February)
Re: Publish WCAG 2.1 FPWD Alastair Campbell (Tuesday, 21 February)
RE: Publish WCAG 2.1 FPWD Smith, Jim (Wednesday, 22 February)
Re: CFC: Publish WCAG 2.1 FPWD Shwetank Dixit (Wednesday, 22 February)
Re: CFC: Publish WCAG 2.1 FPWD Alex Bernier (Wednesday, 22 February)
Re: CFC: Publish WCAG 2.1 FPWD Detlev Fischer (Wednesday, 22 February)
Re: CFC: Publish WCAG 2.1 FPWD Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. (Wednesday, 22 February)
RE: Publish WCAG 2.1 FPWD Repsher, Stephen J (Wednesday, 22 February)
Re: CFC: Publish WCAG 2.1 FPWD Jeanne Spellman (Wednesday, 22 February)
Re: CFC: Publish WCAG 2.1 FPWD Patrick H. Lauke (Wednesday, 22 February)
Re: CFC: Publish WCAG 2.1 FPWD Andrew Kirkpatrick (Thursday, 23 February)
- Re: I will vote against WCAG 2.1 Draft Patrick H. Lauke (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: I will vote against WCAG 2.1 Draft Wayne Dick (Monday, 20 February)
- RE: I will vote against WCAG 2.1 Draft White, Jason J (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: I will vote against WCAG 2.1 Draft Gregg C Vanderheiden (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: I will vote against WCAG 2.1 Draft John Foliot (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: I will vote against WCAG 2.1 Draft Gregg C Vanderheiden (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: I will vote against WCAG 2.1 Draft David MacDonald (Monday, 20 February)
- RE: I will vote against WCAG 2.1 Draft White, Jason J (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: I will vote against WCAG 2.1 Draft Hakkinen, Mark T (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: I will vote against WCAG 2.1 Draft John Foliot (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: I will vote against WCAG 2.1 Draft Hakkinen, Mark T (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: I will vote against WCAG 2.1 Draft David MacDonald (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: I will vote against WCAG 2.1 Draft Joshue O Connor (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: I will vote against WCAG 2.1 Draft David MacDonald (Monday, 20 February)
- RE: I will vote against WCAG 2.1 Draft Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: I will vote against WCAG 2.1 Draft Laura Carlson (Monday, 20 February)
- RE: I will vote against WCAG 2.1 Draft Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: I will vote against WCAG 2.1 Draft David MacDonald (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: I will vote against WCAG 2.1 Draft David MacDonald (Monday, 20 February)
- Re: I will vote against WCAG 2.1 Draft Marc Johlic (Monday, 20 February)
- RE: I will vote against WCAG 2.1 Draft Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Monday, 20 February)
Re: I will vote against WCAG 2.1 Draft David MacDonald (Monday, 20 February)
RE: I will vote against WCAG 2.1 Draft Milliken, Neil (Wednesday, 22 February)
Re: proposed change for simple words in labels etc. Patrick H. Lauke (Sunday, 19 February)
RE: proposed change for simple words in labels etc. Michael Pluke (Sunday, 19 February)
Linearization Wayne Dick (Thursday, 16 February)
Re: Publishing FPWD - immediate response needed. Detlev Fischer (Thursday, 16 February)
Re: Publishing FPWD - immediate response needed. Thaddeus . (Thursday, 16 February)
Re: Publishing FPWD - immediate response needed. Laura Carlson (Thursday, 16 February)
Re: Publishing FPWD - immediate response needed. Michael Gower (Thursday, 16 February)
Re: Publishing FPWD - immediate response needed. Jim Allan (Thursday, 16 February)
Re: Publishing FPWD - immediate response needed. Wayne Dick (Thursday, 16 February)
Re: Publishing FPWD - immediate response needed. Moe Kraft (Thursday, 16 February)
RE: Publishing FPWD - immediate response needed. Repsher, Stephen J (Thursday, 16 February)
Re: Publishing FPWD - immediate response needed. Mary Jo Mueller (Thursday, 16 February)
Re: Publishing FPWD - immediate response needed. Andrew Kirkpatrick (Friday, 17 February)
Re: Publishing FPWD - immediate response needed. David MacDonald (Friday, 17 February)
Re: UA tools & adaptation, was: "we should not allow user testing in exceptions" Alastair Campbell (Thursday, 16 February)
RE: UA tools & adaptation, was: "we should not allow user testing in exceptions" Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Friday, 17 February)
Re: Does anyone else agree with my perspective - was Re: "we should not allow user testing in exceptions" (was Re: clarifing the debate) Joshue O Connor (Thursday, 16 February)
Re: Does anyone else agree with my perspective - was Re: "we should not allow user testing in exceptions" (was Re: clarifing the debate) McSorley, Jan (Thursday, 16 February)
RE: "we should not allow user testing in exceptions" (was Re: clarifing the debate) White, Jason J (Wednesday, 15 February)
Language SC lisa.seeman (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: CFC: Manual testing processes Katie Haritos-Shea (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: CFC: Manual testing processes Léonie Watson (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: CFC: Manual testing processes David MacDonald (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: CFC: Manual testing processes Gregg C Vanderheiden (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: CFC: Manual testing processes Shwetank Dixit (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: CFC: Manual testing processes Laura Carlson (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: CFC: Manual testing processes Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: CFC: Manual testing processes Jim Allan (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: CFC: Manual testing processes Glenda Sims (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: CFC: Manual testing processes Jeanne Spellman (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: CFC: Manual testing processes Detlev Fischer (Tuesday, 14 February)
- Re: Manual testing processes Shilpi Kapoor (Wednesday, 15 February)
- RE: Manual testing processes Repsher, Stephen J (Wednesday, 15 February)
- RE: Manual testing processes Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L. (Wednesday, 15 February)
- Re: CFC: Manual testing processes Wayne Dick (Thursday, 16 February)
LVTF question lisa.seeman (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: AGWG meeting February 14, 2017 McSorley, Jan (Monday, 13 February)
- Re: AGWG meeting February 14, 2017 Butler, Shari (Monday, 13 February)
- RE: AGWG meeting February 14, 2017 Bailey, Bruce (Tuesday, 14 February)
- RE: AGWG meeting February 14, 2017 Michael Pluke (Tuesday, 14 February)
Device Sensors SC Jonathan Avila (Friday, 10 February)
Re: does anyone currently fail colour contrast for text in timed media Patrick H. Lauke (Thursday, 9 February)
Zoom Vs Wordwrap Joshue O Connor (Saturday, 4 February)
Progressing SC work Joshue O Connor (Thursday, 2 February)
Scribes Andrew Kirkpatrick (Thursday, 2 February)
- Re: WCAG meeting January 31st 2017 Moe Kraft (Friday, 27 January)
- Re: WCAG meeting January 31st 2017 Alastair Campbell (Friday, 27 January)
- RE: WCAG meeting January 31st 2017 Jonathan Avila (Monday, 30 January)
- RE: WCAG meeting January 31st 2017 Bailey, Bruce (Monday, 30 January)
- Re: WCAG meeting January 31st 2017 Michael Gower (Monday, 30 January)
- Re: WCAG meeting January 31st 2017 Marc Johlic (Tuesday, 31 January)
- RE: WCAG meeting January 31st 2017 Michael Pluke (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: WCAG meeting January 31st 2017 Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. (Tuesday, 31 January)
- RE: WCAG meeting January 31st 2017 Smith, Jim (Tuesday, 31 January)
- RE: WCAG meeting January 31st 2017 Daniela Di Gianantonio (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: WCAG meeting January 24, 2017 Alastair Campbell (Tuesday, 24 January)
- RE: WCAG meeting January 24, 2017 Bailey, Bruce (Tuesday, 24 January)
- RE: WCAG meeting January 24, 2017 Smith, Jim (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: WCAG meeting January 24, 2017 Detlev Fischer (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: WCAG meeting January 24, 2017, MINUTES ATTACHED Michael Gower (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: New Wiki page with SC text proposals to combine issues 79, 78, and 74 John Foliot (Monday, 23 January)
- Re: New Wiki page with SC text proposals to combine issues 79, 78, and 74 Laura Carlson (Monday, 23 January)
- RE: New Wiki page with SC text proposals to combine issues 79, 78, and 74 White, Jason J (Monday, 23 January)
- Re: New Wiki page with SC text proposals to combine issues 79, 78, and 74 Laura Carlson (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: New Wiki page with SC text proposals to combine issues 79, 78, and 74 Alastair Campbell (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: New Wiki page with SC text proposals to combine issues 79, 78, and 74 David MacDonald (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: New Wiki page with SC text proposals to combine issues 79, 78, and 74 Gregg C Vanderheiden (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: New Wiki page with SC text proposals to combine issues 79, 78, and 74 Alastair Campbell (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: New Wiki page with SC text proposals to combine issues 79, 78, and 74 Laura Carlson (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: New Wiki page with SC text proposals to combine issues 79, 78, and 74 Alastair Campbell (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: New Wiki page with SC text proposals to combine issues 79, 78, and 74 Alastair Campbell (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: New Wiki page with SC text proposals to combine issues 79, 78, and 74 Laura Carlson (Wednesday, 25 January)
- personalization as a technique - was Re: New Wiki page with SC text proposals to combine issues 79, 78, and 74 lisa.seeman (Monday, 30 January)
- Re: personalization as a technique - was Re: New Wiki page with SC text proposals to combine issues 79, 78, and 74 Laura Carlson (Monday, 30 January)
- Re: personalization as a technique - was Re: New Wiki page with SC text proposals to combine issues 79, 78, and 74 Alastair Campbell (Monday, 30 January)
- Re: personalization as a technique - was Re: New Wiki page with SC text proposals to combine issues 79, 78, and 74 Glenda Sims (Monday, 30 January)
- Re: personalization as a technique - was Re: New Wiki page with SC text proposals to combine issues 79, 78, and 74 Jim Allan (Monday, 30 January)
- Re: personalization as a technique - was Re: New Wiki page with SC text proposals to combine issues 79, 78, and 74 lisa.seeman (Tuesday, 31 January)
- Re: New Wiki page with SC text proposals to combine issues 79, 78, and 74 Laura Carlson (Wednesday, 25 January)
Re: New Wiki page with SC text proposals to combine issues 79, 78, and 74 Gregg C Vanderheiden (Tuesday, 24 January)
Re: New Wiki page with SC text proposals to combine issues 79, 78, and 74 Laura Carlson (Tuesday, 24 January)
Re: New Wiki page with SC text proposals to combine issues 79, 78, and 74 Alastair Campbell (Monday, 23 January)
- Re: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer) John Foliot (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer) Laura Carlson (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer) David MacDonald (Friday, 20 January)
- Re: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer) Laura Carlson (Saturday, 21 January)
- Re: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer) Gregg C Vanderheiden (Saturday, 21 January)
- Re: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer) Laura Carlson (Saturday, 21 January)
- Re: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer) Gregg C Vanderheiden (Saturday, 21 January)
- RE: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer) Jonathan Avila (Saturday, 21 January)
- Re: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer) David MacDonald (Saturday, 21 January)
- Re: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer) Gregg C Vanderheiden (Saturday, 21 January)
- RE: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer) Jonathan Avila (Sunday, 22 January)
- Re: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer) David MacDonald (Sunday, 22 January)
- Re: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer) David MacDonald (Sunday, 22 January)
- Re: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer) Laura Carlson (Sunday, 22 January)
- RE: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer) White, Jason J (Sunday, 22 January)
- Re: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer) Gregg C Vanderheiden (Sunday, 22 January)
- Re: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer) David MacDonald (Sunday, 22 January)
- RE: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer) Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Sunday, 22 January)
- Re: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer) David MacDonald (Monday, 23 January)
- Re: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer) Mike Elledge (Monday, 23 January)
- RE: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer) Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Monday, 23 January)
- Re: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer) Alastair Campbell (Monday, 23 January)
- Re: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer) Gregg C Vanderheiden (Monday, 23 January)
- Re: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer) Alastair Campbell (Monday, 23 January)
- Re: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer) Gregg C Vanderheiden (Monday, 23 January)
- Re: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer) Alastair Campbell (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer) Patrick H. Lauke (Tuesday, 24 January)
- Re: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer) Gregg C Vanderheiden (Saturday, 21 January)
RE: Mechanism Disclaimer Jonathan Avila (Friday, 20 January)
Length of line David MacDonald (Tuesday, 10 January)
- Re: Length of line EA Draffan (Tuesday, 10 January)
- Re: Length of line John Foliot (Tuesday, 10 January)
- RE: Length of line Michael Pluke (Wednesday, 11 January)
- Re: Length of line David MacDonald (Wednesday, 11 January)
- Re: Length of line Shwetank Dixit (Wednesday, 11 January)
- Re: Length of line David MacDonald (Wednesday, 11 January)
- Re: Length of line Patrick H. Lauke (Wednesday, 11 January)
- Re: Length of line David MacDonald (Wednesday, 11 January)
- Re: Length of line John Foliot (Wednesday, 11 January)
- Re: Length of line John Foliot (Wednesday, 11 January)
- Re: Length of line David MacDonald (Wednesday, 11 January)
- RE: Length of line Jonathan Avila (Wednesday, 11 January)
- Re: Length of line John Foliot (Wednesday, 11 January)
- Re: Length of line David MacDonald (Wednesday, 11 January)
- Re: Length of line David MacDonald (Wednesday, 11 January)
- Re: Length of line Wayne Dick (Wednesday, 11 January)
- Re: Length of line John Foliot (Wednesday, 11 January)
- Re: Length of line Laura Carlson (Wednesday, 11 January)
- Re: Length of line John Foliot (Wednesday, 11 January)
- Re: Length of line David MacDonald (Wednesday, 11 January)
- Re: Length of line John Foliot (Thursday, 12 January)
- Re: Length of line David MacDonald (Thursday, 12 January)
- Re: Length of line Wayne Dick (Thursday, 12 January)
- Re: Length of line Alastair Campbell (Thursday, 12 January)
- Re: Length of line Shwetank Dixit (Thursday, 12 January)
- Re: Length of line Alastair Campbell (Thursday, 12 January)
- Re: Length of line Alastair Campbell (Thursday, 12 January)
- Re: Length of line Jim Allan (Thursday, 12 January)
- Re: Length of line John Foliot (Thursday, 12 January)
- Re: Length of line David MacDonald (Thursday, 12 January)
- Re: Length of line Alastair Campbell (Friday, 13 January)
- Re: Length of line Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 13 January)
- Re: Length of line David MacDonald (Friday, 13 January)
- RE: Length of line White, Jason J (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: Length of line Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 3 February)
- RE: Length of line White, Jason J (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: Length of line Gregg C Vanderheiden (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: Length of line Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: Length of line Gregg C Vanderheiden (Friday, 3 February)
- RE: Length of line White, Jason J (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: Length of line Alastair Campbell (Friday, 3 February)
- RE: Length of line White, Jason J (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: Length of line David MacDonald (Wednesday, 11 January)
- RE: Length of line Chakravarthula, Srinivasu (Thursday, 12 January)
- Re: Length of line & Resize & Reflow. Alastair Campbell (Wednesday, 11 January)
- Re: Length of line & Resize & Reflow. David MacDonald (Thursday, 12 January)
- Re: Length of line & Resize & Reflow. Alastair Campbell (Thursday, 12 January)
- Re: Length of line Patrick H. Lauke (Wednesday, 11 January)
- Re: Length of line David MacDonald (Wednesday, 11 January)
Re: Length of line John Foliot (Wednesday, 11 January)
RE: Length of line Jonathan Avila (Wednesday, 11 January)
RE: Length of line Jonathan Avila (Wednesday, 11 January)
Re: Length of line Wayne Dick (Friday, 3 February)
Re: Length of line Wayne Dick (Friday, 3 February)
- Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Glenda Sims (Tuesday, 10 January)
- Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Laura Carlson (Tuesday, 10 January)
- Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Patrick H. Lauke (Tuesday, 10 January)
- Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Gregg C Vanderheiden (Tuesday, 10 January)
- Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Patrick H. Lauke (Tuesday, 10 January)
- Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Gregg C Vanderheiden (Tuesday, 10 January)
- Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Gregg C Vanderheiden (Wednesday, 11 January)
- Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Patrick H. Lauke (Wednesday, 11 January)
- Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 David MacDonald (Wednesday, 11 January)
- Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Gregg C Vanderheiden (Wednesday, 11 January)
- Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Patrick H. Lauke (Wednesday, 11 January)
- Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Gregg C Vanderheiden (Thursday, 12 January)
- Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Patrick H. Lauke (Thursday, 12 January)
- Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Gregg C Vanderheiden (Friday, 13 January)
- Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Patrick H. Lauke (Friday, 13 January)
- Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Gregg C Vanderheiden (Friday, 13 January)
- Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Alastair Campbell (Friday, 13 January)
- RE: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Jonathan Avila (Friday, 13 January)
- Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Alastair Campbell (Friday, 13 January)
- Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Detlev Fischer (Saturday, 14 January)
- Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Patrick H. Lauke (Saturday, 14 January)
- Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Detlev Fischer (Saturday, 14 January)
- Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Patrick H. Lauke (Saturday, 14 January)
- Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Detlev Fischer (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Alastair Campbell (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Detlev Fischer (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Alastair Campbell (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Detlev Fischer (Monday, 16 January)
- Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Alastair Campbell (Monday, 16 January)
- RE: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Wednesday, 11 January)
Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18 David MacDonald (Tuesday, 10 January)
- Re: WCAG meeting January 10, 2017 Glenda Sims (Monday, 9 January)
- Re: WCAG meeting January 10, 2017 Detlev Fischer (Tuesday, 10 January)
- Re: WCAG meeting January 10, 2017 Wilco Fiers (Tuesday, 10 January)
- RE: WCAG meeting January 10, 2017 Jonathan Avila (Tuesday, 10 January)
- Re: WCAG meeting January 10, 2017 Alastair Campbell (Tuesday, 10 January)
RE: Re[2]: Should we require labels to be always visible? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Friday, 6 January)
Re: Re[2]: Should we require labels to be always visible? Glenda Sims (Friday, 6 January)
Re: Should we require labels to be always visible? Marla Runyan (Sunday, 8 January)
Re: Re[2]: Should we require labels to be always visible? David MacDonald (Friday, 6 January)
RE: Re[2]: Should we require labels to be always visible? Jonathan Avila (Friday, 6 January)
Re: Re[2]: Should we require labels to be always visible? Glenda Sims (Friday, 6 January)
RE: Re[2]: Should we require labels to be always visible? White, Jason J (Friday, 13 January)
Re: Re[2]: Should we require labels to be always visible? David MacDonald (Friday, 13 January)
Re: Re[2]: Should we require labels to be always visible? Mike Elledge (Friday, 13 January)
RE: Re[2]: Should we require labels to be always visible? White, Jason J (Friday, 13 January)
RE: Re[2]: Should we require labels to be always visible? Jonathan Avila (Monday, 16 January)
Re: Re[2]: Should we require labels to be always visible? David MacDonald (Monday, 16 January)
Re: Re[2]: Should we require labels to be always visible? David MacDonald (Monday, 16 January)
RE: Re[2]: Should we require labels to be always visible? White, Jason J (Friday, 13 January)
RE: Re[2]: Should we require labels to be always visible? Jonathan Avila (Friday, 6 January)
RE: Should we require labels to be always visible? Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Friday, 6 January)
Re: Should we require labels to be always visible? Andrew Kirkpatrick (Friday, 6 January)
Re: Re[2]: Should we require labels to be always visible? Sailesh Panchang (Saturday, 14 January)
Re: Word count of New SC compared to WCAG 2 Léonie Watson (Tuesday, 3 January)
Re: Word count of New SC compared to WCAG 2 Alastair Campbell (Wednesday, 4 January)
RE: Word count of New SC compared to WCAG 2 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Wednesday, 4 January)
Re: Word count of New SC compared to WCAG 2 David MacDonald (Wednesday, 4 January)
RE: Word count of New SC compared to WCAG 2 White, Jason J (Wednesday, 4 January)
Re: Word count of New SC compared to WCAG 2 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Wednesday, 4 January)
RE: Word count of New SC compared to WCAG 2 Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL (Wednesday, 4 January)
RE: Word count of New SC compared to WCAG 2 lisa.seeman (Wednesday, 4 January)
Re: Word count of New SC compared to WCAG 2 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Tuesday, 3 January)
Re[2]: requirement 8 josh@interaccess.ie (Tuesday, 3 January)
Re: requirement 8 Andrew Kirkpatrick (Tuesday, 3 January)
Last message date: Friday, 31 March 2017 21:32:17 UTC