"we should not allow user testing in exceptions" (was Re: clarifing the debate)


Lisa has a fair point.

Can I request that a second CfC go out that explicitly states that "we
should not allow user testing in exceptions" - for the same reasons that
user-testing for conformance was rejected?

This way we can be sure that the consensus has been recorded properly and
accurately, and everyone understands what they are registering their
position on.



On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 9:48 AM, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:

> Just to clarify. It is valid to feel we should not allow user testing in
> exceptions.
> My issue is  that the debate on the resolution was to require use testing
> for conformance  as a blanket requirement before anyone can make a
> conformance claim. That was passed.
> We must not now just increase the scope and add implications to that
> resolution  without debate.
> We could have the debate and find we have consensus, but  we can not
> attach it to a debate that had a different scope and implications and call
> it resolved with consensus.  It was not.
> All the best
> Lisa Seeman
> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>

John Foliot
Principal Accessibility Strategist
Deque Systems Inc.

Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion

Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2017 15:59:29 UTC