Re: CFC: Changes to Editor's draft require CFCs

+1 that non-editorial changes to the content of the editor’s draft requires
a CFC by the Working Group.

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
wrote:

> Call For Consensus — ends Friday March 31st at 10:00pm Boston time.
>
> On last Tuesday’s call the WG came to a resolution regarding the agreement
> on items being included in the editor’s draft. This CFC is to verify that
> the Working Group agrees that non-editorial changes to the content of the
> editor’s draft requires a CFC by the Working Group. The editor’s draft
> currently contains, and will continue to contain, only items that the
> Working Group has reached consensus on.
>
> For background:
> Call minutes: http://www.w3.org/2017/03/28-ag-minutes.html#item03
> <http://www.w3.org/2017/02/07-ag-minutes.html>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
> Thanks,
> AWK
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility
> Adobe
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>

Received on Thursday, 30 March 2017 15:05:08 UTC