- From: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 09:16:40 -0800
- To: GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJeQ8SAnMabQt2hLAwq3tKM1hRFttPK5OHduFzGbymnrc2eUdw@mail.gmail.com>
I think our old means of testing may be the problem faced by many new SCs. If a range of values is 16M we cannot look at all of them. How ever if we only pick 2 that may not be enough for a quirky page we cannot even predict, because we are all reasonable coders. Why not consider new methods of testing. Like sampling. Take color. We have a sample space of 16M squared. Of those only a subset is viable since contrast is needed. But it is still a very big number. I it would make sense to compile a list distribution of the number of foreground and background colors used by web sites. Step 1 or 2 standard deviations beyond the mean add 1 to that number and test that many color pairs chosen randomly so that color contrast is maintained. For COGA we could employ user testing. Once again computing sample size is straight forward. We would have to give up determinism for acceptable probability. Most product testing is done that way. They don't test every car of the assembly line for crash survival. When we have ranges to large to test by hand or machine, or we have tests that require user testing we can use statistics. That will give us .95 assurance, and really, do we do better with accessibility testing. Wayne
Received on Monday, 6 February 2017 17:17:54 UTC