- From: Mike Elledge <melledge@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 20:14:39 +0000 (UTC)
- To: WCAG WG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 19 January 2017 20:22:46 UTC
Hi All-- I've run into contradictory opinions about SEO optimization and accessibility best practices for images. My understanding: - Title tags for images are unnecessary and increase clutter unless 1) an alternative description cannot be provided for an image (can't think of an example), in which case a screen reader will default to the title, or 2) they provide information that is contained in an alternative description but not available--and would be helpful--to sighted users. - Having alternative text for an image when it is described by adjacent text is redundant to screen reader users and should be avoided. SEO Expert opinion: - Every image should have both an alternative description and a title to optimize SEO. - Adjacent text is important to SEO, so include it as well. Can anyone sort this out? I've found a couple of articles that say image titles have a minimal affect, but nothing that addresses this directly. Thanks... Mike
Received on Thursday, 19 January 2017 20:22:46 UTC