RE: We should not separate outt at risk SC

Hi Lisa,

The draft in the main section of which document? Would you please provide its URL? Thank you.

John

John Rochford<http://bit.ly/profile-rj>
UMass Medical School/E.K. Shriver Center
Director, INDEX Program
Instructor, Family Medicine & Community Health
www.DisabilityInfo.org
Twitter: @ClearHelper<https://twitter.com/clearhelper>

Confidentiality Notice:
This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary, and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and destroy or permanently delete all copies of the original message.

From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 5, 2017 3:05 PM
To: W3c-Wai-Gl-Request@W3. Org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: We should not separate outt at risk SC

Hi Folks
Can we have  any "at risk" SC  placed in the draft in the main section with an editors note with the issues that need to be addressed. I do not think they should be a separate "at risk " section.
Firstly it is not necessary in a first working draft. This high speed processing of SC does not make it easy to resolve trick issues, and what is needed is time and effort.

However if they are in a section at the end they will look downgraded, the readers will ignore them, when in fact they are the very SC that we need feedback for.


All the best
Lisa