RE: Suggested wording for SCs that do not meet all the requirements

Thanks, David – I’m just making a few minor edits below.

From: David MacDonald [mailto:david100@sympatico.ca]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 4:25 PM

<h2>Incomplete Candidate Success Criteria</h2>
<p>The following are success criteria proposals by the task forces that have been identified to address important accessibility barriers on the web. However, they have not yet met one or more of the <a href="https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_Success_Criteria>requirements for success criteria. </a> We are seeking feedback on the proposals to determine whether or how they can meet all the requirements, such as being testable, implementable, apply to all content, and apply across all technologies (or how to manage exceptions).  In addition, review from the perspective of internationalization for proposals dealing with language and symbology is requested.


________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.

________________________________