Re: Success Criterion #32 - Help

Quick comment

 The second half is a command rather than a true./false statement (the format of SC) 
You might want to fix it.

Also i wonder about the test ability.    What is long, what is complex, etc.  and what is explanatory.

Great advice but it will be a challenge to make it testable 

Gregg


Sent from my iPad

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 5:06 PM, McSorley, Jan <jan.mcsorley@pearson.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Everyone,
> 
> I am assigned as the manager for Success Criterion #32.  There are some comments on GitHub this SC that I would encourage you to review.  This success criterion is about contextual help and the proposal is to create a new SC that is AA.  There is also discussion about the format of the SC and whether or not it should be broken into smaller SCs.  Please review and comment in GitHub so that we can move this SC forward.
> 
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/32
> 
> 
> ​​Best to you,
> 
> Jan McSorley
> VP, Accessibility
> Psychometrics and Testing Services
>  
> 400 Center Ridge Drive, Suite E
> Austin, TX  78753
> M - (512) 673-9569
> Twitter: @Jan_McSorley
> Skype:  jan.mcsorley
> www.linkedin.com/in/janmcsorley
>  
> Learn more at pearson.com
>  
> 
> 
> We put a man on the moon in the 1960's ... surely we can make information technology fully accessible to people with disabilities.  It can be done ... it must be done ... it will be done!