Re: I will vote against WCAG 2.1 Draft

Success Criteria are made up of words. "conceptual issues, lack of data, or
other difficult problems" would have to be captured as words.  But we can
leave off the request for "reworded"... How about

h2>Incomplete Candidate Success Criteria</h2>
<p>The following are success criteria proposals by the task forces that
have been identified to address important accessibility barriers on the
web. However, they have not yet met one or more of the <a href="
https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_Success_Criteria>requirements for a
success criteria. </a> We are seeking suggestions on how they can meet the
requirements for success criteria (i.e., testable, implementable, apply to
all content, and apply across all technologies etc.).

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Hakkinen, Mark T <mhakkinen@ets.org> wrote:

> Jason, I disagree with David’s proposal.  Suggesting that it is just
> wording changes that are needed when if fact there may be conceptual
> issues, lack of data, or other difficult problems.  It invites reviewers to
> edit, but not explore the deeper issues.
>
>
>
> On 2/20/17, 3:12 PM, "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* David MacDonald [mailto:david100@sympatico.ca]
> *Sent:* Monday, February 20, 2017 3:02 PM
>
>
> >Incomplete Candidates" ?
>
>
>
> It could be something like this.
>
> *[Jason] […]*
>
> *I would be comfortable with language such as that which David has put
> forward here, preferably after moving the proposals into an Appendix, but
> leaving the two proposals that the working group agreed should go in the
> draft in the body of the document.*
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom
> it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail
> in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
> take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete
> it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>
>
>
> Thank you for your compliance.
> ------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom
> it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail
> in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
> take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete
> it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>
> Thank you for your compliance.
> ------------------------------
>