- From: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 21:00:24 -0800
- To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJeQ8SAEYjPb8_WADcJShUprPXVFYJ2D7j9++dSTj3N65-fbZQ@mail.gmail.com>
-1 Our testing methodology has not proven to be as reliable as we think. I think there may be cases where user testing is necessary. We are not making success criteria to make life easy for developers or auditors. We are removing barriers. We have a year and a half before this is released. I think it is time for accessibility auditors to include user testing when no other reliable testing method exists to assess the presence of a barrier. There are reliable small sample testing techniques. Accessibility auditors should learn them. Wayne On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 7:19 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote: > Call For Consensus — ends Wednesday February 15th at 10:30pm Boston time. > > The requirements for WCAG 2.1 SC's (https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/ > wiki/WCAG_2.1_Success_Criteria have been discussed at length. Included in > the requirements is #2, which states "Be testable through automated or > manual processes”, which indicates that in order for a success criteria to > be regarded as “testable” it must be possible to determine whether a page > passes that criteria using automated or manual testing processes. > > On last Tuesday’s call the WG came to a resolution regarding this item, > specifically related to user testing. The group also surveyed this > question, and arrived at a unanimous agreement: > > "User testing is not a required part of a manual testing process for WCAG > test criteria.” > > This resolution indicates that if the only way to test a success criteria > is to conduct user testing, then that is not “testable” with regard to > WCAGT 2.1. > > The Working Group will recommend strongly in WCAG 2.1 (as it did in WCAG > 2.0) that user testing be conducted. > > For background: > Call minutes: http://www.w3.org/2017/02/07-ag-minutes.html > Survey: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/testing20170207/results#xq1 > > If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not > been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not > being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before > the CfC deadline. > > Thanks, > AWK > > Andrew Kirkpatrick > Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility > Adobe > > akirkpat@adobe.com > http://twitter.com/awkawk >
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2017 05:02:08 UTC