Re: definition of the a/aa/aaa levels

I think silver needs to be a complete rethink of accessibility.  

the world is changing rapidly and we need to get in front of it.      We keep tuning guidelines for todays technologies which will be yesterdays before we get done playing with them.   

we need to start discussions of accessibility of 
verbal/visual pages
agent oriented web access
what will cognitive AT look like and what do we need to support them. 
the merging of content, agents, and author tools
the role apps are playing vs web apps
augmented reality 
Lets get those discussions going before we get lost in conformance levels. 

gregg

Gregg C Vanderheiden
greggvan@umd.edu



> On Mar 27, 2017, at 11:30 AM, White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote:
> 
>  
>   <>
> From: David MacDonald [mailto:david100@sympatico.ca <mailto:david100@sympatico.ca>] 
> Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 11:07 AM
> 
> So I'm fine with using these and other categories as an initial way to try to assign levels, but we should no publish a set of considerations for why they were put there... I think that's a rat hole, from which Gregg is trying to spare us.
> 
> [Jason] This is fine for 2.1, but for Silver, I would like to see another attempt to establish a principled distinction between conformance levels.
> In particular, I think the designers of Silver should consider creating only two conformance levels, in recognition of the fact that (even under WCAG 2.0) most policies require Level AA conformance, and hence the de facto distinction is between Level AA and Level AAA conformance. This is an argument for collapsing A and AA in Silver.
>  
> 
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
> 
> 
> Thank you for your compliance.
>