Re: I will vote against WCAG 2.1 Draft

I rewrote David’s proposal.  I wanted to also capture the issue of internationalization. The changes start of the link.

<h2>Incomplete Candidate Success Criteria</h2>
<p>The following are success criteria proposals by the task forces that have been identified to address important accessibility barriers on the web. However, they have not yet met one or more of the <a href="https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_Success_Criteria>requirements for a success criteria. </a> We are seeking feedback on the proposals to determine whether or how they can meet the requirements of being testable, implementable, apply to all content, and apply across all technologies (or how to manage exceptions).  In addition, review from the perspective of internationalization for proposals dealing with language and symbology is requested.


On 2/20/17, 4:07 PM, "John Foliot" <john.foliot@deque.com<mailto:john.foliot@deque.com>> wrote:

Hmmm...

I agree with Mark, but I also like the direction that David was suggesting. Perhaps the "explanation" paragraph needs some reworking:

<draft>

<p>The following are success criteria proposals by the task forces that have been identified to address important accessibility barriers on the web. However, they have not yet met one or more of the <a href="https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_Success_Criteria>requirements for a success criteria</a>, or are otherwise not mature enough for direct inclusion today. The Working Group solicits broader feedback on both the substance and editorial content of these draft Candidates.</p>

</draft>

Something like that?

JF

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Hakkinen, Mark T <mhakkinen@ets.org<mailto:mhakkinen@ets.org>> wrote:
Jason, I disagree with David’s proposal.  Suggesting that it is just wording changes that are needed when if fact there may be conceptual issues, lack of data, or other difficult problems.  It invites reviewers to edit, but not explore the deeper issues.

On 2/20/17, 3:12 PM, "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org<mailto:jjwhite@ets.org>> wrote:



From: David MacDonald [mailto:david100@sympatico.ca<mailto:david100@sympatico.ca>]
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 3:02 PM

>Incomplete Candidates" ?

It could be something like this.
[Jason] […]
I would be comfortable with language such as that which David has put forward here, preferably after moving the proposals into an Appendix, but leaving the two proposals that the working group agreed should go in the draft in the body of the document.


________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.

________________________________

________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.

________________________________



--
John Foliot
Principal Accessibility Strategist
Deque Systems Inc.
john.foliot@deque.com<mailto:john.foliot@deque.com>

Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion

________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.

________________________________