- From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 17:17:12 +0000
- To: Gregg C Vanderheiden <greggvan@umd.edu>, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>, GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Gregg, I agree with that in principle but given that we are not able to make changes to the requires W3C template quickly we won’t be able to do that for the FWPD. Thanks, AWK Andrew Kirkpatrick Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility Adobe akirkpat@adobe.com http://twitter.com/awkawk On 2/19/17, 11:47, "Gregg C Vanderheiden" <greggvan@umd.edu> wrote: >One of the criteria for a Success Critions is that it is practical to apply across web content. > >Since the WCAG is full of experts at making web pages accessible — it seems to me that a good test of any SC would be that the WCAG can figure out how to make any page conform to them. > Not that we need to start fixing everyone’s pages — but if someone asserts the proposed SC can’t be met by a page (with minor fix that doesn’t wreck the functionality) that should be a good indication that the SC would not meet the test. > >AT A MINUMUM - we should be able to make the current draft WCAG 2.1 meet all of the Level A and AA SC. > > >Gregg C Vanderheiden >greggvan@umd.edu > > >
Received on Sunday, 19 February 2017 17:17:50 UTC