I think it makes a lot of sense that we stick to semantic versioning, which
would mean that if we want something replace, we mark the old one as
deprecated, and we create a new one with a new number and title.
Replacing criteria is a path to confusion and madness IMO.
Wilco
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
wrote:
> The question has been raised about this, and to clarify, the decision
> arrived at was that the working group would not modify WCAG 2.0 SC in the
> new SC proposals. The group intends to review the collection of new SC’s
> together after FPWD and re-review this decision in order to try to find the
> best balance of readability/usability of the spec and stability of existing
> SC.
>
> We made this decision following a survey in January (
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/ModifySCs/results) and any
> statements that may have seemed to contradict this decision were
> unintentional.
>
> Thanks,
> AWK
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
> Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility
> Adobe
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>
--
*Wilco Fiers*
Senior Accessibility Engineer - Co-facilitator WCAG-ACT - Chair Auto-WCAG
