RE: Support as an SC prefix?

+1 
Great modification that communicates the intent much better

Alan Smith

From: Alastair Campbell
Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 8:21 AM
To: WCAG
Subject: Support as an SC prefix?

Hi everyone,

There is an interesting point raised on github for the SCs which are aimed at authors enabling something without (necessarily) adding on-screen widgets:
https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/159#issuecomment-285020097

“Maybe the use of the "Support" prefix would be a useful standard to set for the SC titles if an on-screen widget is not required, so that in this case it would be "Support Reflow to Single Column", just as we have "Support Personalization".
This would also suggest a rename of 1.4.13 to "Support Printing", for example.”

It would be an alternative to the “mechanism is available” language, hopefully leading people away from assuming there would be on-screen widgets.

If that were taking on, I think it would lead to:
• Support linearization (Or ‘Support reflow to single column’)
• Support printing (Or ‘Support adaptations when printing’ might be more accurate.)
• Support adapting text
• Support extra symbols.

And possibly others from COGA that didn’t make it to the FPWD.

So two questions:
1. Do you think this approach is helpful? And if so,
2. Is “support” the right prefix?

Kind regards,

-Alastair

-- 

www.nomensa.com
tel: +44 (0)117 929 7333 / 07970 879 653
follow us: @we_are_nomensa or me: @alastc
Nomensa Ltd. King William House, 13 Queen Square, Bristol BS1 4NT

Company number: 4214477 | UK VAT registration: GB 771727411