Re: This is significantly different from what was agreed. - was Re: CFC: Manual testing processes

Hi Patrick

There is no slippery slope. We will only add it to enable exceptions explicitly to specific success criteria were it really useful. 


All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter





---- On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 16:43:24 +0200 Patrick H. Lauke<redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote ---- 

My concern with having user testing as a means to trigger an exception 
would be that it's a slippery slope. Will other SCs get this type of 
exception? Does this in essence say 
 
"you as an author MUST follow this SC ... unless you can find 5 people 
that say you not following this SC is fine" 
 
This suggests to me as a reader that the normative advice in the SC is 
actually quite context-dependent, so perhaps shouldn't be normative 
advice in the first place unless the exact context can be unambiguously 
defined? 
 
P 
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke 
 
www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke 
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com 
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke