- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 14:25:15 +0000
- To: GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
On 03/02/2017 14:22, Gregg C Vanderheiden wrote: >> [Jason] I would interpret it as a user agent requirement >> masquerading as a content requirement. It ought to be clarified to >> state the circumstances under which the content author needs to >> provide the mechanism, or dropped entirely. >> > I don’t see where you get that — it is an AUTHOR requirement that is > future proofed to avoid the author having to solve the problem if > browsers or AT can provide it without author action in the future How would you interpret "If the user-agent fits the layout to the view port, and does not provide a means of re-flowing content, then two-dimensional scrolling is exempt." from the original proposed SC text here https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/57 ? It seems to exempt authors in situations where the UA doesn't do what the SC is asking for, unless I'm missing a nuance. P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Friday, 3 February 2017 14:25:40 UTC