- From: Repsher, Stephen J <stephen.j.repsher@boeing.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:23:34 +0000
- To: Gregg C Vanderheiden <greggvan@umd.edu>, "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- CC: "w3c-waI-gl@w3. org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Usage as footnotes aside, superscripts and subscripts within scientific and mathematical notations obviously carry much more than aesthetic meaning. In MathML, a link can be added to almost any variable or expression, and this can provide important accessibility to quickly find meanings or alternate explanations. Steve -----Original Message----- From: Gregg C Vanderheiden [mailto:greggvan@umd.edu] Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 9:52 AM To: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> Cc: w3c-waI-gl@w3. org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Subject: Re: Discriminatory Convensions and Aesthetics +1 Gregg C Vanderheiden greggvan@umd.edu > On Mar 15, 2017, at 7:09 AM, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote: > > On 14/03/2017 21:09, Wayne Dick wrote: > >> There are many discriminatory aesthetic conversions on the web, and >> in its predecessor, print. Are small subscripts and superscripts >> useful or necessary, or are they just conversion, habit? Publishers >> who wanted to save paper probably found that books would sell just as >> well if sub/super scripts were reduced in size. That probably saved >> paper by enabling less line separation. Does this conversion really >> make sense on a flexible medium like web content, or is it discriminatory habit? > > I would say that these sorts of elements also convey a visual sense of hierarchy / importance - de-emphasising certain ancilliary aspects (like references to a footnote) to make them less visually obtrusive when reading the actual text. > >> I think that the clear active elements SC addresses one of these >> discriminatory aesthetics. When a super / sub script is a link it is >> something completely different than anything that ever existed on paper. >> It is a super script character and a link - a paper impossibility. >> Why do we use paper conversions for this important extension of paper >> capability? I think the answer is habit. > > Habit, which also means familiarity for users, who are likely acquainted with that particular convention from print and may therefore recognise its meaning even in a different / digital context. > > P > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > > www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke > http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com > twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke >
Received on Wednesday, 15 March 2017 15:24:17 UTC