Re: CFC: Manual testing processes

All,
We resolved this CFC on February 16, so no further votes on the CFC are required at this time! :)

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2017JanMar/0886.html


Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility
Adobe

akirkpat@adobe.com
http://twitter.com/awkawk


From: David MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com<mailto:david@can-adapt.com>>
Date: Sunday, March 5, 2017 at 13:51
To: Gregg Vanderheiden <greggvan@umd.edu<mailto:greggvan@umd.edu>>
Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Subject: Re: CFC: Manual testing processes
Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Sunday, March 5, 2017 at 13:52

+1

Cheers,
David MacDonald



CanAdaptSolutions Inc.

Tel:  613.235.4902

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd<http://twitter.com/davidmacd>

GitHub<https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com<http://www.can-adapt.com/>



  Adapting the web to all users

            Including those with disabilities

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Gregg C Vanderheiden <greggvan@umd.edu<mailto:greggvan@umd.edu>> wrote:
+1
Gregg C Vanderheiden
greggvan@umd.edu<mailto:greggvan@umd.edu>



On Mar 4, 2017, at 5:26 PM, David MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com<mailto:david@can-adapt.com>> wrote:




+1

Cheers,
David MacDonald



CanAdapt Solutions Inc.
Tel:  613.235.4902<tel:(613)%20235-4902>
LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
twitter.com/davidmacd<http://twitter.com/davidmacd>
GitHub<https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
www.Can-Adapt.com<http://www.can-adapt.com/>



  Adapting the web to all users
            Including those with disabilities

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:19 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>> wrote:
Call For Consensus — ends Wednesday February 15th at 10:30pm Boston time.

The requirements for WCAG 2.1 SC's (https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_Success_Criteria have been discussed at length. Included in the requirements is #2, which states "Be testable through automated or manual processes”, which indicates that in order for a success criteria to be regarded as “testable” it must be possible to determine whether a page passes that criteria using automated or manual testing processes.

On last Tuesday’s call the WG came to a resolution regarding this item, specifically related to user testing. The group also surveyed this question, and arrived at a unanimous agreement:

"User testing is not a required part of a manual testing process for WCAG test criteria.”

This resolution indicates that if the only way to test a success criteria is to conduct user testing, then that is not “testable” with regard to WCAGT 2.1.

The Working Group will recommend strongly in WCAG 2.1 (as it did in WCAG 2.0) that user testing be conducted.

For background:
Call minutes: http://www.w3.org/2017/02/07-ag-minutes.html

Survey: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/testing20170207/results#xq1


If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility
Adobe

akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
http://twitter.com/awkawk