- From: Michael Gower <michael.gower@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 14:07:05 +0000
- To: Mike Elledge <melledge@yahoo.com>
- Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <OFD1AACD61.439F5214-ON882580CF.004D3FEB-882580CF.004D8CCC@notes.na.collabserv.c>
Contrast (minimum) currently only appplies to text and images of text, so at the moment it does not apply. There are also textual cues and headings indicating when each criterion begins and ends. Best practice, yes, it should get bumped up. Michael Gower IBM Accessibility Research 1803 Douglas Street, Victoria, BC V8T 5C3 gowerm@ca.ibm.com voice: (250) 220-1146 * cel: (250) 661-0098 * fax: (250) 220-8034 From: Mike Elledge <melledge@yahoo.com> To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Date: 2017-02-22 05:55 AM Subject: Re: CFC: Publish WCAG 2.1 FPWD +1. Any concerns that the orange square for proposed SC does not meet contrast requirements? Mike On Wednesday, February 22, 2017 7:18 AM, "Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc." <makoto.ueki@gmail.com> wrote: +1 to publish Cheers, Makoto 2017-02-22 3:26 GMT+09:00 Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>: > Call For Consensus — ends Thursday February 23th at 1:30pm Boston time. > > The Working Group discussed the latest editor’s draft of WCAG 2.1 > (https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/FPWD_review/guidelines/index.html) and > basedon a survey ( https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/WCAG21FWPD/results) > and a Working Group call (http://www.w3.org/2017/02/21-ag-minutes.html) > where the majority of comments were > resolved and no blocking issues remained. > > On the call people believed that we had reached a consensus position that > the Working Group should publish the Editor's Draft as the First Publish > Working Draft (FPWD). This will allow the group to meet its charter > deadline. The Working Group included several SC that do not have Working > Group consensus, but the Working Group did have consensus that publishing > was valuable in order to get additional feedback from the public, and notes > were included in the draft to point out aspects that do not have consensus > at this time. > > If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not > been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being > able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC > deadline. > > Thanks, > AWK > > Andrew Kirkpatrick > Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility > Adobe > > akirkpat@adobe.com > http://twitter.com/awkawk
Attachments
- image/png attachment: 01-part
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2017 14:07:50 UTC