Re: process for second pull request

On 10/02/2017 11:00, Alastair Campbell wrote:
> So long as the SC manager makes the pull request, they should be able to keep the description up to date, e.g:
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/pull/100
>
> I think that’s the best approach… unless SC managers can’t do the pull request?

The problem is that the discussion is then scattered between the 
original Github issue, n number of PR threads, plus a conference call or 
two and quite possibly some discussion on the email list.



Léonie
-- 
@LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem



>
> -Alastair
>

Received on Monday, 13 February 2017 09:59:16 UTC