- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 09:21:12 -0500
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
- Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAdDpDY=eYZAS3T19cNEZaSZm1bpSG4gnx_aScpzVqZ2Yn6=ew@mail.gmail.com>
So in layman's terms I think what the SC is saying is "Don't get in the way of user style sheets by sticking "!important" on classes of your style sheets." And a test for that would be a global search through all the style sheets looking for the word !important and ensuring it does not encroach upon changing fonts. Is that right? Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 8:10 AM, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote: > On 20/01/2017 12:18, Alastair Campbell wrote: > > Well, we’re covering web-content rather than native apps >> > > Interesting side note: during discussions in MATF, there has always been > some circling around "we want to also target native (mobile) apps", with > the point that native apps are still "content". While I share your view > that this is about the content only, already with things like Flash we had > a certain blurring of the lines (as yes, Flash is content, but essentially > its own isolated user agent in many ways). > > Just because something isn’t supported on mobile doesn’t mean we >> shouldn’t improve things on desktop, assuming that it doesn’t make >> the mobile experience worse for everyone else. I think that applies >> to Resize content and several other SCs as well. >> > > Sure, I just want to make sure the language is crystal clear - because if > the SC mandates that something be possible, and the platform doesn't > natively provide it (no browser, no OS feature, etc) then it needs to be > clear that the onus then doesn't fall on the author to provide > customisation dialogs and widgets (unless they want to). > > > P > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > > www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke > http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com > twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke > >
Received on Friday, 20 January 2017 14:22:17 UTC