Re: leaving SC out of the draft - this is an issue that must get consensus

On 07/02/2017 19:33, White, Jason J wrote:
> */[Jason] I’m comfortable with omitting from this first draft anything
> that has not reached the stage of development at which circulating it
> for external review is appropriate. I expect proposals to be added to
> and deleted from drafts as the WCAG 2.1 effort proceeds, just as
> occurred with WCAG 1.0 and 2.0 when they were under development./*
> */I think it would be highly undesirable to expect everyone to bring
> their proposals to the point at which external review is desirable in
> time for releasing a first public working draft. Let’s simply avoid that
> kind of pressure. I know participants in this group are working hard as
> it is./*
> */I am also concerned that giving public reviewers a large number of
> proposals of varying quality to respond to could (1) create negative
> impressions of the work over-all, and (2) overwhelm reviewers with
> issues without obtaining focused comments on proposals that the working
> group considers ready for wider circulation and comment./*
> */Consider this a statement in favor of a more focused first public
> working draft to which additional proposals can be added as the work
> progresses./*

Agree with Jason's take on this.

Patrick H. Lauke | |
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2017 19:52:19 UTC