Individually, many of us are very engaged in cutting edge research,
creating inventions and dreaming of ways we can make the web more
inclusive.
As a group, my understanding is that our role has been to survey all the
techniques and tools that are out there, and throw our collective weight
behind solutions that are implementable by *web authors* and also to inform
them of *how not to interfere* with existing tools.
Once in a while we can push the envelope a little beyond those things, but
I don't think we can stray too far beyond that role without loosing
credibility.
Cheers,
David MacDonald
*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Tel: 613.235.4902
LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
twitter.com/davidmacd
GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
* Adapting the web to all users*
* Including those with disabilities*
If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 3:17 PM, White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From:* lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 16, 2017 3:09 PM
>
> I think we are what we choose to be. DO most of us want to be a vetting
> committee?
>
>
>
> I would rather we are improving accessibility and enabling more inclusion.
>
> *[Jason] I would argue that there’s no inherent contradiction between the
> two descriptions and that most of us subscribe to both.*
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom
> it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail
> in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
> take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete
> it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
>
> Thank you for your compliance.
> ------------------------------
>