Re: process for second pull request

Léonie wrote:
> Providing the SC manager is able to edit the issue thread, they would be the ones responsible for updating the draft SC in response to feedback from different places. 

Because Jim put up all the LVTF SCs as issues, we had the problem of the SC manager not being able to update the description, and it made Jim a bottleneck for updates. (He was good at making updates, but it just added another step across timezones.)

So long as the SC manager makes the pull request, they should be able to keep the description up to date, e.g: 

I think that’s the best approach… unless SC managers can’t do the pull request?


Received on Friday, 10 February 2017 11:00:57 UTC