Re: Standing consent to publish working drafts on monthly schedule

Gregg wrote:

> To keep publishing new versions when the comments have not been cleared from the last is not good practice and not considerate of reviewers.

> I do not understand the rationale

IMO: to enable some parallel working.

For example, the next version could add one or more SCs, which would be fresh for reviewers.

It does require careful highlighting of what is changed in each version, and the status of comments should be apparent (i.e. in the github issue, say when it has been addressed).

Personally, I advocated a publish-all then whittle down approach [1], but no one else commented on that.




Received on Thursday, 30 March 2017 09:08:40 UTC