Re: Graphics contrast updates

+1 to Jim's idea - as an early substitute to the Understanding Documents
that will need to be written, I am assuming that the wiki pages for each of
the newly proposed SC would suffice at first pass, as the data there will
likely end up in the Understanding docs more often than not.

Great idea Jim!

JF

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu> wrote:

> I like the idea of linking to the wiki page, which contains the
> Description, Benefits, Examples, and related research.
>
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
> wrote:
>
>> > I better understand what the intent here is now, but I think a bit more
>> wordsmithing may be in order, or a fuller explanation in an Understanding
>> doc (to come, I know...)​
>>
>>
>>
>> Sure, having been through it with quite a few people now (including
>> several or our designers) I’m confident the concept works. However, without
>> the description & examples it is not an easy thing to pick up.  (Neither
>> were many of the WCAG2.0 SCs though, so that isn’t new!)
>>
>>
>>
>> I guess that will be a painful part of the FPWD, unless we can link
>> through to an equivalent of the understanding document? E.g. the wiki page
>> or github issue.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>
>>
>> -Alastair
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator
> Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired
> 1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756
> voice 512.206.9315 <(512)%20206-9315>    fax: 512.206.9264
> <(512)%20206-9264>  http://www.tsbvi.edu/
> "We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964
>



-- 
John Foliot
Principal Accessibility Strategist
Deque Systems Inc.
john.foliot@deque.com

Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion