- From: Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 11:34:19 -0600
- To: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>
- Cc: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, Shawn Lauriat <lauriat@google.com>, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>, "josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie>, "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAH2ngERKT0dT-NiGEWyXVc-7jfNdx7Xv_4z2UNHe35fYDhg0ww@mail.gmail.com>
+1 to Jonathan's interpretation/recommendation. Glenda (Goodwitch) Sims glenda sims | team a11y lead | deque.com | 512.963.3773 *web for everyone. web on everything.* - w3 goals On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com> wrote: > Ø https://www.google.com – it has title=“search” and > aria-label=“search”, does it need a visible label? > > > > We’ve had this discussion many times on the list. I believe the current > SC 3.3.2 requires visible labels for all input based on the normative > definition and note of label in WCAG 2.0. > > > > A visible label doesn’t have to be text and could be an icon, button or > graphic such as a “search” button that is in close proximity to the input > field. A placeholder would serve as the visual label when the field does > not have text in it. As soon as the field has text in it then another > visual label would be needed. I support the float label technique > described here: > > http://bradfrost.com/blog/post/float-label-pattern/ > > > > Jonathan > > > > Jonathan Avila > > Chief Accessibility Officer > > SSB BART Group > > jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com > > 703.637.8957 <(703)%20637-8957> (Office) > > > > Visit us online: Website <http://www.ssbbartgroup.com/> | Twitter > <https://twitter.com/SSBBARTGroup> | Facebook > <https://www.facebook.com/ssbbartgroup> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/355266?trk=tyah> | Blog > <http://www.ssbbartgroup.com/blog/> > > Don't miss *Trends in Accessibility & Electronic Documents* on Wed 12/7! > <http://info.ssbbartgroup.com/Accessibility-Trends-and-Documents.html?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWXpsak9XWTJNbUV5T1RneiIsInQiOiJzWWlWT2FiUnpjS1hOYmx5dzdHRUs1d0lcL2Y4VjBHU1EyRWZuSm40aFQ2TE51Zm4wUU9PaGowcGN4Nm5UdFhnMTVxUHFBSHAwR21BODV1UGc2TFloV1NaUFNvbE8wU05IV2> > > > > The information contained in this transmission may be attorney privileged > and/or confidential information intended for the use of the individual or > entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, > distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. > > > > *From:* Andrew Kirkpatrick [mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com] > *Sent:* Friday, January 06, 2017 11:51 AM > *To:* Shawn Lauriat; David MacDonald > *Cc:* josh@interaccess.ie; lisa.seeman; Detlev Fischer; WCAG > > *Subject:* Re: Re[2]: Should we require labels to be always visible? > > > > One of the other classic cases: > > > > https://www.google.com – it has title=“search” and aria-label=“search”, > does it need a visible label? > > > > Thanks, > > AWK > > > > Andrew Kirkpatrick > > Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility > > Adobe > > > > akirkpat@adobe.com > > http://twitter.com/awkawk > > > > *From: *Shawn Lauriat <lauriat@google.com> > *Date: *Friday, January 6, 2017 at 11:45 > *To: *David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> > *Cc: *"josh@interaccess.ie" <josh@interaccess.ie>, "lisa.seeman@zoho.com" > <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>, Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>, > WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > *Subject: *Re: Re[2]: Should we require labels to be always visible? > *Resent-From: *WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > *Resent-Date: *Friday, January 6, 2017 at 11:46 > > > > As my two cents, I would say always required, and beyond helping around > cognitive and low-vision, to situational impairments: > > - If the browser helpfully fills in all fields, with duplicate entries > in four of them, you have no way of knowing what data really belongs in > which field. > - If you start to fill out a form and then the phone rings, diverting > your attention for an extended period, you won't remember the fields. Even > if you just have focus in the field, the placeholder falls off. > > Beyond that, using placeholder as a label goes against HTML spec > <https://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html5-20110525/common-input-element-attributes.html#the-placeholder-attribute>. > I know everyone does it these days, so I always say that the label should > move from inside/over the input to above or next to it, so it remains > visible. > > > > Limited space comes down to a design challenge, not a reason to forgo a > visible label. > > > > -Shawn > > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 11:26 AM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> > wrote: > > I would say it's already a best practice... > > > > Lisa, are those with cognitive disabilities likely to loose track of what > the field label is, if it disappears after they click on it? Is that a > common complaint out in the wild about placeholder text for labels? > > > Cheers, > David MacDonald > > > > *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* > > Tel: 613.235.4902 <(613)%20235-4902> > > LinkedIn > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> > > twitter.com/davidmacd > > GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> > > www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> > > > > * Adapting the web to all users* > > * Including those with disabilities* > > > > If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy > <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> > > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 11:15 AM, josh@interaccess.ie <josh@interaccess.ie> > wrote: > > <chair hat off> > > >Would it help the cognitive community if the label is always visible. > > I like the demo David :-) > > I couldn't see my clients wearing having to do that. On mobile, there are > times when screen real estate is so sparse that at best you get an icon and > placeholder text. > > I just don't think that would fly as a MUST, as best practice maybe. As > long as it fits into the look and feel guidelines etc. > > My 2 cents > > Josh > > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Detlev Fischer" <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de> > To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org; david100@sympatico.ca > Sent: 06/01/2017 16:03:31 > Subject: Re: Should we require labels to be always visible? > > That's one way of doing it, but there will be others. So the requirement > might be EITHER have external visible label OR if using placeholder, show > label next to field after focussing field. > Note that some implementations keep the placeholder text visible even > after focussing (mostly grey text) until you start typing, which I > personally find confusing. Not sure whether some SC (COGA?) or technique > addresses this yet. > > David MacDonald schrieb am 06.01.2017 16:51: > > > Most of the sites I evaluate these days seem to have placeholder text for > labels. An aria-label helps, but the label still disappears on focus or on > clicking into the field. > > > Would it help the cognitive community if the label is always visible. So > for placeholder labels, should we require that the label appears near the > field when the user clicks or tabs to the field? Like this? > > > http://davidmacd.com/widgets/floating-label/floating-placeholder1.html < > http://davidmacd.com/widgets/floating-label/floating-placeholder1.html> > > > Cheers, > David MacDonald > > > > CanAdapt Solutions Inc. > > Tel: 613.235.4902 > > LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> > > > twitter.com/davidmacd <http://twitter.com/davidmacd> > > GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> > > www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> > > > > Adapting the web to all users > > Including those with disabilities > > > If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy < > http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> > > > > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 6 January 2017 17:34:52 UTC