- From: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 10:32:25 -0600
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKdCpxxQ7KH7JPTwsmBHN9zH+QzkkBwQDUzkYoYfnBX8nnnpSw@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks Alastair. > For a solid icon it would be large enough, but if the icon is an outline, then the 'stroke' / border thickness would need to be > 3px (not possible for an 8px icon??). No, but very few icons are 8px X 8px - in fact I think most start at 16px square and go from there (my 8 X 8 was a deliberate strawman). I better understand what the intent here is now, but I think a bit more wordsmithing may be in order, or a fuller explanation in an Understanding doc (to come, I know...) JF On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Thanks to everyone who made comments on the survey about the Graphics > contrast SC, I've responded to them all here: > https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/pull/100#issuecomment-278184960 > > Patrick's update I added to the pull request (thanks!). > > JohnF & Kimberlee in particular, could you please check my responses are > reasonable? > > I'm not proposing to update the SC text due to the comments, but it is > definitely good input on the kind of questions people will have when > reading the understanding document. It will also need lots of examples... > > Kind regards, > > -Alastair > -- John Foliot Principal Accessibility Strategist Deque Systems Inc. john.foliot@deque.com Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2017 16:33:02 UTC