RE: Overlaps in SC

If we were not at FPWD I would agree with you. Now that these have been published as a FPWD – and reviewers were not expressly requested not to look at where things overlap – I think we have to take overlaps into account as reviewers of this document will be doing the same.

Regards,

James

 

From: lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 11:35 AM
To: W3c-Wai-Gl-Request@W3. Org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: Overlaps in SC

 

Hi Folks

It seems some of us are hugely focused on overlaps.

 

What has been explained to me is that we expect overlaps at this stage - in fact we have a decision to not worry about overlaps for the moment, and just approve SC on their own merits, and then later decide what we want to do about overlaps, when we have the full set in front of us. 

 

Clearly if the SC is fully duplicative of existing ones, then we should being that u p or if a full bullet point can cleanly  be removed  - then it should be. 

 

If we are not on the same page on this it should be discussed. Otherwise we should not be refocusing on minor overlaps

 

All the best

 

Lisa

 



 <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/> LinkedIn, Twitter <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>