- From: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 08:12:04 -0600
- To: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Cc: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKdCpxzReGL2KA3L04pUGHWFdAw9JZzbpF2zJzfpsrEvvuzVNw@mail.gmail.com>
+1 JF On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 8:07 AM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> wrote: > +1 > > Cheers, > David MacDonald > > > > *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* > > Tel: 613.235.4902 <(613)%20235-4902> > > LinkedIn > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> > > twitter.com/davidmacd > > GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> > > www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> > > > > * Adapting the web to all users* > * Including those with disabilities* > > If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy > <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:19 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> > wrote: > >> Call For Consensus — ends Wednesday February 15th at 10:30pm Boston time. >> >> The requirements for WCAG 2.1 SC's (https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wik >> i/WCAG_2.1_Success_Criteria have been discussed at length. Included in >> the requirements is #2, which states "Be testable through automated or >> manual processes”, which indicates that in order for a success criteria to >> be regarded as “testable” it must be possible to determine whether a page >> passes that criteria using automated or manual testing processes. >> >> On last Tuesday’s call the WG came to a resolution regarding this item, >> specifically related to user testing. The group also surveyed this >> question, and arrived at a unanimous agreement: >> >> "User testing is not a required part of a manual testing process for WCAG >> test criteria.” >> >> This resolution indicates that if the only way to test a success criteria >> is to conduct user testing, then that is not “testable” with regard to >> WCAGT 2.1. >> >> The Working Group will recommend strongly in WCAG 2.1 (as it did in WCAG >> 2.0) that user testing be conducted. >> >> For background: >> Call minutes: http://www.w3.org/2017/02/07-ag-minutes.html >> Survey: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/testing20170207/results#xq1 >> >> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not >> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not >> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before >> the CfC deadline. >> >> Thanks, >> AWK >> >> Andrew Kirkpatrick >> Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility >> Adobe >> >> akirkpat@adobe.com >> http://twitter.com/awkawk >> > > -- John Foliot Principal Accessibility Strategist Deque Systems Inc. john.foliot@deque.com Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion
Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2017 14:12:38 UTC