Re: Does anyone else agree with my perspective - was Re: "we should not allow user testing in exceptions" (was Re: clarifying the debate)

> On Feb 17, 2017, at 12:02 PM, White, Jason J <> wrote:
> [Jason] WCAG 1 reflected the best requirements that the working group was able to distill from the expertise available to it. The focus of the work always was how to make the Web more “cross-disability accessible”, and not on any specific disability or selection of disabilities.
> WCAG 2 advanced in at least two directions: making conformance to the requirements more reliably testable, and generalizing them to be applicable to more technologies and in a greater variety of circumstances.

We also did a lot of secondary-research to develop research-based quantitative measures for a number of things — and evaluation tools to make them easy to measure

Gregg C Vanderheiden

Received on Friday, 17 February 2017 17:29:24 UTC