From: John Foliot [mailto:john.foliot@deque.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 10:59 AM Can I request that a second CfC go out that explicitly states that "we should not allow user testing in exceptions" - for the same reasons that user-testing for conformance was rejected? [Jason] Exceptions are part of conformance, and I would interpret the prior CfC as excluding exceptions in normative text of WCAG that depend on undertaking user testing. If it comes to another CfC, I’ll be supporting a position that disallows such exceptions: whether content conforms or not should be decidable without having to engage in user testing. ________________________________ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. Thank you for your compliance. ________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2017 16:48:55 UTC