Re: Testability of Animation from interactions Issue 18

Hi David,

The definition of "Significant animation" currently is: "Animation
which continues for more than 1 second, and affects more than 1/3 of
the view of the webpage." So if we changed the test procedure we would
need to change the definition. Does that help?

Yes, it is a big requirement. I Nat has been conducting more research.
https://twitter.com/nattarnoff/status/803963858859814912
I'll ask if he has results of that survey.

Thank you.

Kindest Regards,
Laura

On 1/10/17, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> I guess I identified 3 things that I'd like to explore:
>
> (1) A definition of "Significant" (Is the test case a definition?)
> (2) It is a major requirement on the modern web which is full of animation,
> so we better be ready to defend it, it requires designers to change
> designs, marketing to carve out space for a button on the "above the fold"
> etc...
> (3) minimal research available on triggering characteristics such as
> (length of exposure, speed, provocation, time of day, etc.)
>
> We have several people sharing their experience which is helpful... I know
> someone who shares Nat's experiences,and I've been talking with them about
> our exploration which she thinks would be helpful...  but I would like more
> information for such a large requirement...
>
> There may be times when animation is helpful... for instance a long home
> page on a website, and the author wants people to scroll down. The
> automated scroll lets them know they are moving to a place on the same
> page, rather than another page, so it helps distinguish an in page link
>  (href=#...) from an regular link (href=http://...)
>
> It will cause many web sites to have to create a gear icon, or another
> button in addition to a "Pause" button on a carousel. One big thing is how
> to create a button that doesn't eat expensive real estate, that is easily
> understood. Is there an icon that people with vestibular disabilities would
> have? DO you say on the button on the $50Million above the fold part of the
> page <button>Stop all animation on this site</button>?
>
> those are my concerns...
>
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
>
>
> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>
> Tel:  613.235.4902
>
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd
>
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>
>
>
> *  Adapting the web to all users*
> *            Including those with disabilities*
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Laura Carlson
> <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am the manager of Issue 18 Animation from interactions [1].  David
>> noted an issue on his spreadsheet that the proposal:
>>
>> "Significant - is hard to test. Big requirement on modern animated
>> web... minimal research available on triggering characteristics such
>> as (length of exposure, speed, provocation, time of day, etc.)"
>>
>> The test in the proposal is:
>>
>> For each example of animation on a page/view check if:
>>
>> 1. The animation is triggered by a user-action, and
>> 2. the animation includes movement that is not essential to the action,
>> and
>> 3. the animation takes more than 1 second and affects more than 1/3 of
>> the webpage view, and
>> 4. there is no way of using the webpage without triggering the animation.
>>
>> If all are true then it fails.
>>
>> Do others think it is hard to test? If so, how could it be made easier?
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Kindest regards,
>> Laura
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/18
>>
>> --
>> Laura L. Carlson
>>
>>
>


-- 
Laura L. Carlson

Received on Tuesday, 10 January 2017 19:28:10 UTC