Re: Publish WCAG 2.1 FPWD

+1 to Publish.
That means Knowbility supports publication.
Wayne

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <
ryladog@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
>
>
> ​​​​​** katie **
>
>
>
> *Katie Haritos-Shea*
> *Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)*
>
>
>
> *Cell: 703-371-5545 <(703)%20371-5545> **|* *ryladog@gmail.com*
> <ryladog@gmail.com> *|* *Oakton, VA **|* *LinkedIn Profile*
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/> *|* *Office: 703-371-5545
> <(703)%20371-5545> **|* *@ryladog* <https://twitter.com/Ryladog>
>
> NOTE: The content of this email should be construed to always be an
> expression of my own personal independent opinion, unless I identify that I
> am speaking on behalf of Knowbility, as their AC Rep at the W3C - and -
> that my personal email never expresses the opinion of my employer, Deque
> Systems.
>
>
>
> *From:* Andrew Kirkpatrick [mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 21, 2017 1:27 PM
> *To:* WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Subject:* CFC: Publish WCAG 2.1 FPWD
> *Importance:* High
>
>
>
> Call For Consensus — ends Thursday February 23th at 1:30pm Boston time.
>
>
>
> The Working Group discussed the latest editor’s draft of WCAG 2.1 (
> https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/FPWD_review/guidelines/index.html) and
> basedon a survey (https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/WCAG21FWPD/results)
> and a Working Group call (http://www.w3.org/2017/02/21-ag-minutes.html)
> where the majority of comments were
>
> resolved and no blocking issues remained.
>
>
>
> On the call people believed that we had reached a consensus position that
> the Working Group should publish the Editor's Draft as the First Publish
> Working Draft (FPWD). This will allow the group to meet its charter
> deadline. The Working Group included several SC that do not have Working
> Group consensus, but the Working Group did have consensus that publishing
> was valuable in order to get additional feedback from the public, and notes
> were included in the draft to point out aspects that do not have consensus
> at this time.
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> AWK
>
>
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>
> Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility
>
> Adobe
>
>
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
>
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>