- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:19:31 +0000
- To: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>, public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>, GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <0F3B8B25-3B9F-4782-9FE6-FAB77F018CB5@nomensa.com>
Hi Jonathan, I’m just changing the subject line as we’re heading off on a tangent that is more to do with Resize content. I went through the examples below, but first I think the basic point stands, if you have a site that is *not* good for zooming, like this pixel-width test case: https://alastairc.ac/tests/layouts/pixels.html That passes 1.4.4 with zooming, but it is rubbish from a low-vision point of view compared to the vast majority of RWD sites. Anyway, on the examples you sent I resized my browser to 1024px wide, and zoomed in 200%: http://www.slidesnack.com/templates-examples/online-presentation-examples#1 The presentations are Flash content, so I assume it is using its own heuristic for re-sizing, rather than the browsers. The content around the flash looks fine! If we are covering flash, then I guess we would have to take a ‘mechanism is available’ approach, but then we run into the “OMG Widgets!” problem. http://guidobouman.github.io/jquery-panelsnap/ Interesting, they use boxes with height: 100% (of the viewport) and overflow-hidden, so expansion gets hidden. The content within each box is then absolutely positioned, so expands out of the box. Ok, that’s a good one, that would fail 1.4.4. That’s a page demoing a plugin, have you seen it used on real sites? https://css-tricks.com/examples/ScrollingSidebar/ That’s a simple test case, not intended to be like a real site, it has a very basic body {overflow-x:hidden;}, I’m quite sure Chris Coyer would not do that on a “real” site. > Another example is floating fixed potion content. http://www.w3schools.com/jquerymobile/tryit.asp?filename=tryjqmob_toolbars_fixed Apart from the Google drive icon disappearing, I don’t see a problem with that one? The content in the right box is visible at 200%. > Header text overlaps content https://css-tricks.com/persistent-headers/ I don’t see a problem here (Chrome, 1024px wide at 200%). I also looked at the demo, which looked fine: https://css-tricks.com/examples/PersistantHeaders/ although again it is a demo, and has body{overflow-x:hidden} Perhaps you mean something like this from the FT? At 400-500% the header is getting very large (proportionally), but still not problematic at 200% https://www.ft.com/ Cheers, -Alastair
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2017 17:20:09 UTC