- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 17:29:43 +0000
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On 14/01/2017 16:11, Detlev Fischer wrote: > Good point. That parallax scroll would be too specific for an SC is > true - one could extend the requirement to any user-initiated > animation that affects the entire viewport (or a large part of it) So just the whole viewport, and not "1/3 of the viewport"? https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/18#issuecomment-272346989 > whether it is nauseous shifts, swirls, wobbles, colour changes or > some other brainchild of the inventive front end designer. My attempt > would be to set this class of animation apart from another class > focussing on specific 'elements' (changing shape or position when > focussed or moved, disappearing in an inverted Aladdin's lamp fashion > in some location, etc). That might alleviate the need to talk about > the size of the area affected, Though you're talking about the entire viewport, so you ARE specifying a size. > which in the absence of further > information on the nature of the movement seems inconclusive. But agree, would like to see some empirical evidence of different types of animations and how they can be disruptive/problematic. P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Saturday, 14 January 2017 17:30:11 UTC