RE: Publishing FPWD - immediate response needed.

From: Andrew Kirkpatrick [mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 11:34 AM

Our feeling is that there are three factors under consideration, and that we can only satisfy two of these:

  1.  Deliver the FPWD on time
  2.  Deliver the FPWD with SC that are well-vetted by the WG
  3.  Deliver the FPWD with a large number of the proposed SC
[Jason] I would prefer achieving 1 and 2, but not 3.
How many of the proposals are at the point at which they’ve been discussed at a meeting and considered eligible for inclusion, with or without specific issues that could be noted in the draft? I don’t mind a small public working draft to start with, as long as it is understood that more will be included as appropriate.


________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.

________________________________