- From: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 17:40:17 -0700
- To: GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 28 March 2017 00:41:30 UTC
Screen reader's audio interface produces a time based media. This is good for many applications, but all readers need a self paced medium for Now there are 40 to 80 character refresh-able braille displays. That is significantly more than a screen magnifier can provide. Word wrapped text can hit the 40 to 80 character level. At the current time blind users have a better self paced interface than people with low vision. A lot of people in the WG and accessibility community say that large print is a need but it places too much burden on developers. That is equivalent to exuding refresh-able braille because of developer difficulty. I does not make sense. Large print with word wrapping is as necessary as refresh-able braille for the same reason. Why do well meaning accessibility experts claim that well formatted large print is just too hard to provide?
Received on Tuesday, 28 March 2017 00:41:30 UTC