clarifing the debate

Just to clarify. It is valid to feel we should not allow user testing in exceptions.

My issue is  that the debate on the resolution was to require use testing for conformance  as a blanket requirement before anyone can make a conformance claim. That was passed. 
We must not now just increase the scope and add implications to that resolution  without debate. 

We could have the debate and find we have consensus, but  we can not attach it to a debate that had a different scope and implications and call it resolved with consensus.  It was not.

All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter

Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2017 15:48:40 UTC