I like the idea of linking to the wiki page, which contains the Description, Benefits, Examples, and related research. On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > > I better understand what the intent here is now, but I think a bit more > wordsmithing may be in order, or a fuller explanation in an Understanding > doc (to come, I know...) > > > > Sure, having been through it with quite a few people now (including > several or our designers) I’m confident the concept works. However, without > the description & examples it is not an easy thing to pick up. (Neither > were many of the WCAG2.0 SCs though, so that isn’t new!) > > > > I guess that will be a painful part of the FPWD, unless we can link > through to an equivalent of the understanding document? E.g. the wiki page > or github issue. > > > > Cheers, > > > > -Alastair > > > > > -- Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired 1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756 voice 512.206.9315 fax: 512.206.9264 http://www.tsbvi.edu/ "We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2017 17:53:29 UTC