Change in process?

this process is not really working. There is a huge curve for people to either understand the wcag constraints or to understand the new disabilities and how they use the web. Our methodology relies on extensive  research and it gets lost in the disjointed github comment. 

After 2.1 first draft is out I suggest we have a dedicated call on each SC or use need where we focus on understand the issues, talk though the use cases and then move on to solving issues with the wording. I don't think they need to be on the main WCAG call, but people should sign up on which SC they are interested in joining that subcall. After the call the new wording can go to a discussion on the list and then a call for consensus , but people should vote if they were on the call, involved in drafting the SC or at least read all the relevant minutes


All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter