Re: Overlaps in SC

> James Nurthen <mailto:james.nurthen@oracle.com>
> 16 March 2017 at 18:45
>
> If we were not at FPWD I would agree with you. Now that these have 
> been published as a FPWD – and reviewers were not expressly requested 
> not to look at where things overlap – I think we have to take overlaps 
> into account as reviewers of this document will be doing the same.
>
+1.

Josh
>
> Regards,
>
> James
>
> *From:*lisa.seeman [mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 16, 2017 11:35 AM
> *To:* W3c-Wai-Gl-Request@W3. Org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Overlaps in SC
>
> Hi Folks
>
> It seems some of us are hugely focused on overlaps.
>
> What has been explained to me is that we expect overlaps at this stage 
> - in fact we have a decision to not worry about overlaps for the 
> moment, and just approve SC on their own merits, and then later decide 
> what we want to do about overlaps, when we have the full set in front 
> of us.
>
> Clearly if the SC is fully duplicative of existing ones, then we 
> should being that u p or if a full bullet point can cleanly  be 
> removed  - then it should be.
>
> If we are not on the same page on this it should be discussed. 
> Otherwise we should not be refocusing on minor overlaps
>
> All the best
>
> Lisa
>
>
>
> LinkedIn<http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter 
> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>
> lisa.seeman <mailto:lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
> 16 March 2017 at 18:34
> Hi Folks
> It seems some of us are hugely focused on overlaps.
>
> What has been explained to me is that we expect overlaps at this stage 
> - in fact we have a decision to not worry about overlaps for the 
> moment, and just approve SC on their own merits, and then later decide 
> what we want to do about overlaps, when we have the full set in front 
> of us.
>
> Clearly if the SC is fully duplicative of existing ones, then we 
> should being that u p or if a full bullet point can cleanly  be 
> removed  - then it should be.
>
> If we are not on the same page on this it should be discussed. 
> Otherwise we should not be refocusing on minor overlaps
>
> All the best
>
> Lisa
>
>
>
> LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter 
> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>
>

-- 
Joshue O Connor
Director | InterAccess.ie