Re: To include or not include "A mechanism is available" language for the Adapting Text SC

Hi again,

You can get to the new comment form on the SC without wading through
all 140+ comments at:
https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/78#new_comment_field

The 2 proposals under consideration are at:
https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/78#issuecomment-289434649

Results so far:
https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Consensus_Tally_for_Adapting_Text_SC_Text

Kindest Regards,
Laura

On 3/27/17, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> We have had considerable discussion (140 comments to date) on the
> Adapting Text SC, Issue 78.
>
> Currently we are attempting to ascertain if we can get consensus on
> one point. It is whether to use "A mechanism is available" language in
> the SC text or not.
>
> Two proposals are under consideration [1]. In a GitHub comment on
> Issue 78, please let us know if you cannot live with:
>
> * Proposal A
> * Proposal B
>
> If you have a preference, please let us know that too. I am tracking
> results in the Consensus Tally for Adapting Text SC Text Wiki page
> [2].
>
> Thank you.
>
> Kindest Regards,
> Laura
>
> [1] https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/issues/78#issuecomment-289434649
> [2]
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Consensus_Tally_for_Adapting_Text_SC_Text
>
> --
> Laura L. Carlson
>


-- 
Laura L. Carlson

Received on Monday, 27 March 2017 18:19:05 UTC