- From: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 10:35:16 -0800
- To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, David MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com>, John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
Hi Everyone, I have studied LV access very carefully for the past 8-years. Here is what made me think that the following core SC's are needed. I'll outline implementation tomorrow. I computed the numbers for scrolling myself using a simulation. Once the publication status on my research is settled, I'll make my analysis available to the group. The Low Vision Core: Part 1: Reflow (block level), Line Size, Resize with Word Wrap The need. The user's eye is damaged in such a way as to reduce or eliminate peripheral vision. The user needs so much enlargement so that only a small area of the document is available to see. For both reasons Jim Allan just started calling both "field loss". One is medical the other is environmental, but they are both field loss. Almost everyone with LV experiences field loss for one reason or another. Think of it this, we are all using a mobile even if our screen is 34-inch. This means we need: 1. Linearized block level elements 2. Narrow content 3. Print that fits the screens and columns Linearized Block Content: This is we currently call Reflow (leading to lots of confusion). There are three reasons to support this. It makes error free page search possible. It enables widening or shortening of content with great flexibility. It makes resize with word wrapping to any size trivial. Narrow Content: This is difficult for a person with normal vision to imagine. For this population (in western languages) 25 characters is almost too much. Sometimes I will use a magnifying lens (optical or digital) just frame a region to a manageable width. Think of looking at a webpage through a cardboard tube. It would wonderful if you could only move down the page and catch everything in your tube. Almost all of us see the web through our tube, and we need it to fit. Resize with Word Wrap: Reading text with horizontal scrolling requires much more scrolling than reading with word wrapping. This is because if you scroll text horizontally, then you scroll line by line. If you have word wrapping, you scroll page by page. The difference in scrolling is extreme. It takes more scrolls to read 300% with horizontal scrolling than it does to read 700% without. Almost all people with low vision need at least two of these three accommodations to read web content. The problem is that as you move through the population of LV individuals it is a different two of three for each person. Hence, we need all three. Access to these accommodations is moderately easy for implement HTML / CSS / JavaScript on desktop and laptop browsers. It takes some authoring cooperation, but no custom code from authors. I I will write about this tomorrow. More Soon, Wayne
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2017 18:36:29 UTC