- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 09:47:49 -0400
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAdDpDZq2Deuv+2V1KU5whVMC753GGWUV+JWTCGvFF5HEot3EQ@mail.gmail.com>
>discriminatory aesthetic conversions Do you mean "convention" rather than "conversion"? Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 7:09 AM, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote: > On 14/03/2017 21:09, Wayne Dick wrote: > > There are many discriminatory aesthetic conversions on the web, and in >> its predecessor, print. Are small subscripts and superscripts useful or >> necessary, or are they just conversion, habit? Publishers who wanted to >> save paper probably found that books would sell just as well if >> sub/super scripts were reduced in size. That probably saved paper by >> enabling less line separation. Does this conversion really make sense on >> a flexible medium like web content, or is it discriminatory habit? >> > > I would say that these sorts of elements also convey a visual sense of > hierarchy / importance - de-emphasising certain ancilliary aspects (like > references to a footnote) to make them less visually obtrusive when reading > the actual text. > > I think that the clear active elements SC addresses one of these >> discriminatory aesthetics. When a super / sub script is a link it is >> something completely different than anything that ever existed on paper. >> It is a super script character and a link - a paper impossibility. Why >> do we use paper conversions for this important extension of paper >> capability? I think the answer is habit. >> > > Habit, which also means familiarity for users, who are likely acquainted > with that particular convention from print and may therefore recognise its > meaning even in a different / digital context. > > P > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > > www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke > http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com > twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke > >
Received on Wednesday, 15 March 2017 13:48:24 UTC