- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 14:07:20 -0500
- To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
- Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAdDpDYsYwXij70tv86jwW_CD0arKeempNuK7vr3mWG1Hrn_0w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Andrew I think the purpose of the Word count has to do with the group's self imposed deadline for the FPWD which is 7 Tuesday's away rather than the final draft which is about 60 Tuesdays away. I would rather not release a FPWD that more than doubles the size of WCAG. I think Leonie has the right idea, that we release the FPWD with the SCs that have been vetted and accepted but the WG (in a general sense), rather than putting all 63 new ones out there. Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com> wrote: > David, > I think that raw word count of draft SC's is not a productive exercise for > comparison. The SC proposals are not finalized SC’s. > > Thanks, > AWK > > Andrew Kirkpatrick > Group Product Manager, Standards and Accessibility > Adobe > > akirkpat@adobe.com > http://twitter.com/awkawk > > From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> > Date: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 13:06 > To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > Subject: Word count of New SC compared to WCAG 2 > Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > Resent-Date: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 13:07 > > As a follow up to the concern raised at the end of the call. I've done a > word count of the total new SCs proposed text (not the Understanding etc...) > > - New SC proposals = 63 SCs (4697 Words) > > The Current WCAG 2.0 > > - 62 SCs at AAA 3318 words > > If we release the 2.1 FPWD on February 27 as scheduled (7 Tuesday's away), > with these new SCs, we will have 125 Success Criteria in the WCAG 2.1 First > Public Working Draft, and it will be 8015 Words (over 2x the size of WCAG > 2). I'm sure we'll do some work on it over the next 7 weeks but I'm > concerned that the world is watching for WCAG next, and has been waiting > over 8 years. Is this the first thing we want to release to these > stakeholders in 8 years? > > I think we may want to postpone our release date for the FPWD, until we > can parse these, figure out how we are going to organize them and make some > preliminary vetting. > > What do others think? > > Cheers, > David MacDonald > > > > *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* > > Tel: 613.235.4902 <(613)%20235-4902> > > LinkedIn > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> > > twitter.com/davidmacd > > GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> > > www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> > > > > * Adapting the web to all users* > * Including those with disabilities* > > If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy > <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> >
Received on Tuesday, 3 January 2017 19:07:54 UTC