Re: This is significantly different from what was agreed. - was Re: CFC: Manual testing processes

My concern with having user testing as a means to trigger an exception 
would be that it's a slippery slope. Will other SCs get this type of 
exception? Does this in essence say

"you as an author MUST follow this SC ... unless you can find 5 people 
that say you not following this SC is fine"

This suggests to me as a reader that the normative advice in the SC is 
actually quite context-dependent, so perhaps shouldn't be normative 
advice in the first place unless the exact context can be unambiguously 
defined?

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke

www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2017 14:43:53 UTC