Re: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer)

+1 with removal of "those". Not needed. ūüėÄ

> On Jan 22, 2017, at 7:23 PM, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> 
> A little tweak so that its not an all or nothing SC that allows authors to ignore it if the Browser doesn't allow ALL those modifications...
> 
> For those web technologies that allow user agents to change *any or all* of the following: 
> - foreground and background colors, 
> - font family‚Äč, 
> - spacing between characters, words, lines, or paragraphs, 
> nothing is done in the content to prevent these modifications. 
> 
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>  
> CanAdapt Solutions Inc.
> Tel:  613.235.4902
> LinkedIn 
> twitter.com/davidmacd
> GitHub
> www.Can-Adapt.com
>   
>   Adapting the web to all users
>             Including those with disabilities
> 
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> 
>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1. I like it!
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> ‚Äč‚Äč‚Äč‚Äč‚Äč* katie *
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Katie Haritos-Shea 
>> Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Cell: 703-371-5545 | ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA | LinkedIn Profile | Office: 703-371-5545 | @ryladog
>> 
>> NOTE: The content of this email should be construed to always be an expression of my own personal independent opinion, unless I identify that I am speaking on behalf of Knowbility, as their AC Rep at the W3C - and - that my personal email never expresses the opinion of my employer, Deque Systems.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: David MacDonald [mailto:david100@sympatico.ca] 
>> Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2017 3:32 PM
>> To: Gregg C Vanderheiden <greggvan@umd.edu>; Jason J White <jjwhite@ets.org>
>> Cc: GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>; public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
>> Subject: Re: Combine 79, 78, and 74 SCs? (was Re: Mechanism Disclaimer)
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I think it's getting better... this seems the easiest to understand 
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> For those web technologies that allow user agents to change the foreground and background colors, font family‚Äč, ‚Äčor the spacing between characters, words, lines, or paragraphs, nothing is done in the content to prevent these modifications. 
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 2:41 PM Gregg C Vanderheiden <greggvan@umd.edu> wrote:
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> On Jan 22, 2017, at 2:26 PM, White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote:
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Features of the technologies relied upon by the content are not used in a way that would restrict the ability, if any, of user agents to change foreground and background colors, font family‚Äč, ‚Äčor the spacing between characters, words, lines, or paragraphs
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I think this is the best of the lot ‚ÄĒ but it still is hard to interpret if you don‚Äôt know in advance what it is trying to get at -  AND why it is written with so many clauses‚Ķ. 
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Here is an explanation (as far as I understand it) for what we are saying and why. 
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Not all technologies have a way for users to change the foreground and background colors, font family‚Äč, ‚Äčor the spacing between characters, words, lines, or paragraphs.  But for those that do, such as HTML for text content, the Author should not use features in a way that would prevent these modifications. 
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Hmmmm
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> how about.
>> 
>> aaFor those web technologies that allow user agents to change the foreground and background colors, font family‚Äč, ‚Äčor the spacing between characters, words, lines, or paragraphs, nothing is done in the content to prevent these modifications. 
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> OR 
>> 
>> Web content technologies are not used in a way that would prevent users from changing the foreground and background colors, font family‚Äč, ‚Äčor the spacing between characters, words, lines, or paragraphs, where the technologies used can allow such changes. 
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> g
>> 
> 

Received on Monday, 23 January 2017 00:48:28 UTC