- From: Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 19:55:34 +0100
- To: Michael Pluke <Mike.Pluke@castle-consult.com>
- Cc: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, Gregg C Vanderheiden <greggvan@umd.edu>, GLWAI Guidelines WG org <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHVyjGMJM-AZH+RJrUFwbQ4cvxDA4Lh_Ju5CtfYE1bq0mZ21GA@mail.gmail.com>
Indeed, manual testing as I've always understood it means testing by accessibility experts with the use of tools. That's also pretty much what the Understanding Conformance documents puts it: All WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria are written as testable criteria for objectively determining if content satisfies them. Testing the Success Criteria would involve a combination of automated testing and human evaluation. The content should be tested by those who understand how people with different types of disabilities use the Web. Testing and testable in the context refer to functional testing, that is verifying that the content functions as expected, or in this case, that it satisfies the Success Criteria. Although content may satisfy all Success Criteria, the content may not always be usable by people with a wide variety of disabilities. Therefore, usability testing is recommended, in addition to the required functional testing. Usability testing aims to determine how well people can use the content for its intended purpose. It is recommended that users with disabilities be included in test groups when performing usability testing. It also draws a clear line between the type of testing that's done to determine if success criteria are satisfied, and the benefits gained through usability testing. Wilco On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Michael Pluke < Mike.Pluke@castle-consult.com> wrote: > +1 > > > > *From:* Alastair Campbell [mailto:acampbell@nomensa.com] > *Sent:* 30 January 2017 18:13 > *To:* Gregg C Vanderheiden <greggvan@umd.edu>; GLWAI Guidelines WG org < > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > *Subject:* Re: Automated and manual testing process > > > > Gregg wrote: > > > Expert testing is a much better term. You need to understand what you > are doing to get reliable test results. > > > > So long as we draw out the assumption of domain: an expert in * > *accessibility**. > > > > That is different to being an expert in a particular user-group, or > user-experience, or user-centred design. > > > > Cheers, > > > > -Alastair > -- *Wilco Fiers* Senior Accessibility Engineer - Co-facilitator WCAG-ACT - Chair Auto-WCAG
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: deque_logo_180p.gif
Received on Monday, 30 January 2017 18:56:07 UTC